Carbon Can Co Endcan Pics
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:42 amSo, here are three pictures of my end can-just need to inprove the brackets, spacer and put mu shorter rear plate hanger on to avoid pic 3
MZ/MuZ Riders
A community for owners and riders or MZ Motorcycles, Scooters, and ATVs.
https://new.mzriders.com/
Carbon Can Co Endcan Pics
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:42 amPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:45 ampic 2
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:49 amPic 3-amd the reason it has to be moved.
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:55 pmLooks just like mine did... Do you like the improved performance?
I still need to order a new plate. must get round to it
I still need to order a new plate. must get round to it
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2004 2:59 amWhysub:
I do like the looks of that can. Really nice!
Honestly IMHO it would look better moved forward and angled down like Gedges... (or are Gedge n' me the only guys who like that look?).
I've ordered a Holeshot stainless Y-pipe and a jet kit from Bernd at Tunebike.de and am sourcing a big oval canister off ebay if I can win one cheap. My budget is $399 USD (or less), same as the aluminum M4 can and pipe (which I am not really crazy about the looks of)... but I am hoping to get either a stainless, titanium or carbon can as an upgrade for my troubles.
As soon as all the parts arrive and I can get the pipe fitted to my liking, I will post pics (and maybe a before/after dyno chart).
Ivan
I do like the looks of that can. Really nice!
Honestly IMHO it would look better moved forward and angled down like Gedges... (or are Gedge n' me the only guys who like that look?).
I've ordered a Holeshot stainless Y-pipe and a jet kit from Bernd at Tunebike.de and am sourcing a big oval canister off ebay if I can win one cheap. My budget is $399 USD (or less), same as the aluminum M4 can and pipe (which I am not really crazy about the looks of)... but I am hoping to get either a stainless, titanium or carbon can as an upgrade for my troubles.
As soon as all the parts arrive and I can get the pipe fitted to my liking, I will post pics (and maybe a before/after dyno chart).
Ivan
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:19 amLove the improvement-in performance, looks and sound (especially the sound ).
Not quite happy with the positioning-am getting a load of different length spacers and differing hangers made so that I can get iot positioned just so, but it is nearly where I want it.
I will have to get around to fitting the rear guard I have-it moves the rear light to under the mudguard, the indicators back 4 inches, and the rear plate out of the reach of the tail pipes.
).
Not quite happy with the positioning-am getting a load of different length spacers and differing hangers made so that I can get iot positioned just so, but it is nearly where I want it.
I will have to get around to fitting the rear guard I have-it moves the rear light to under the mudguard, the indicators back 4 inches, and the rear plate out of the reach of the tail pipes.
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 3:00 pmIs it as loud as the bloke at CCC says?
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:14 amIt is quite loud, but no more than an Akro or Arrow system that some have on their KTM's. It is slightly louder than standard 
It is stamped as road legal, and when "going easy" is quiet (do the twin outlets make a difference?)-but not so when giving it the berries (sounds nice in London's Limehouse Link). Power definately comes in with more of a kick now.
One other important benefit is that I seem to be getting more miles out of a tank of petrol, on the same run at the same speed. Maybe the weight loss (not mine, I hasten to add) and the easier breathing motor helps.
Still had no time to change to the short rear guard, let alone move the indicators.
It is stamped as road legal, and when "going easy" is quiet (do the twin outlets make a difference?)-but not so when giving it the berries (sounds nice in London's Limehouse Link). Power definately comes in with more of a kick now.
One other important benefit is that I seem to be getting more miles out of a tank of petrol, on the same run at the same speed. Maybe the weight loss (not mine, I hasten to add) and the easier breathing motor helps.
Still had no time to change to the short rear guard, let alone move the indicators.
PLATE
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:19 pmMY OH MY ARE THOSE ENGLISH LICENSE PLATES
UGLY AND WAY TOOOOO BIG
UGLY AND WAY TOOOOO BIG
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:48 pmUnfortunatly as the first country to introduce number plates (and postage stamps BTW) we are stuck with an old attitude with number plates. Still at least we keep the same one for the life of the vehicle, saves having to change then all the time.
Keith
Keith
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:22 pmShould the brakes fail they act as a very good parachute though
the plate as it should be
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 4:02 pmhere is what they should look like
on a 800x600 monitor it is about 1/2 inch smaller in width than the real thing
and yes the yellow thing is the mot or inspecton sticker
and yes it is expired but can do that when the doc says i can drive
and yes i like that plate its on the saxon tour
ar dave
on a 800x600 monitor it is about 1/2 inch smaller in width than the real thing
and yes the yellow thing is the mot or inspecton sticker
and yes it is expired but can do that when the doc says i can drive
and yes i like that plate its on the saxon tour
ar dave
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 4:39 pmthe UK registration plate is a curse, bt sadly the governmenmt shows no sign of changing its size ( ifanything I am sure they would make them even bigger to help the scameras) 